Friday, April 27, 2012

“Casting a Cold Eye on Arctic Oil”

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on “Casting a Cold Eye on Arctic Oil”. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality “Casting a Cold Eye on Arctic Oil” paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in “Casting a Cold Eye on Arctic Oil”, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your “Casting a Cold Eye on Arctic Oil” paper at affordable prices with Live Paper Help!



Nicholas D. Kristof’s editorial entitled “Casting a Cold Eye on Arctic Oil” provides a credible personification in itself. Written as a first hand account, the author clearly takes a stand regarding the debate about whether or not to drill in the Arctic Wildlife refuge. His main idea asserts that by excavating the land for drilling we would deprive our children of our national inheritance (Kristof A5). Also, the topic is identified as general and theoretical.


The first stage of his argument, conjecture, is that there is an argument to be considered. “The argument I find most compelling is that this primordial wilderness, a part of our national inheritance that is roughly the same as a thousand years ago, would be irretrievably lost if we drilled,” states Kristof (Kristof A5). He acknowledges that both the environmentalists and oil industry have differing opinions on how to use the land in the Arctic wilderness, of which he agrees with the preservation of the land.


Secondly, he defines his argument by expounding on the contrasting arguments of each party. The “coastal plain is a wasteland” and the “impact of the drilling would be a ,000-acre footprint,” contend the drilling supporters (Kristof A5). On the contrary, the author periodically inserts his argument that saving the land will allow us to show our kids the original appearance of America (Kristof A5). Kairos is engaged by the oil drillers when they talk about Daniel Esty’s proposed deal which would just be exploratory drilling, until something is found. This perfect timing is an attempt to appease the environmentalists so that they might give into the argument.


Next, Kristof employs the seriousness of the issue by explaining what the possible outcomes could be. Proposing that we drill there, if it results that there are limited oil reserves then they would have wasted the wilderness for nothing. In addition, drilling would also include excavation of the land far more to exceed the ,000 acres that drilling supporters anticipated. This gross understatement by the oil supporters spurs Kristof to list all the other consequences of the drilling. “It’s also fair to give special weight to the view of the only people who live in the coastal plains,” Kristof asserts (Kristof A5). On the other hand, following the environmentalist approach would anger the local Eskimos who strongly favor the drilling in hopes of acquiring wealth and power. “If environmentalists were so anxious about the Arctic, they should come here and clean up the petroleum that naturally seeps to the surface,” said angry Eskimo Bert Akootchook (Kristof A5). However, by not drilling it is agreed they could be squandering the opportunity to tap into a source so the dependence on foreign oil is eliminated.


Write my Essay on “Casting a Cold Eye on Arctic Oil” for me

essay writing service



Finally, a procedure is offered in attempt to settle this dispute. Kristof affirms that President Bush’s policy to drill in the Arctic refuge is just an endeavor to “lunge for oil” (Kristof A5). As a zealous believer of no drilling in the Arctic refuge, Mr. Kristof decides to let Congress determine the fate of the land.


In conclusion, the author does reach stasis because both parties agree that there is a disagreement on all bases of the argument. A resolution is possible once the decision of Congress is published. I am sure the polar bears won’t mind.


Kristof, Nicholas D. “Casting a Cold Eye on Arctic Oil.” The New York Times 10 Sep. 00 A5.


Please note that this sample paper on “Casting a Cold Eye on Arctic Oil” is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on “Casting a Cold Eye on Arctic Oil”, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on “Casting a Cold Eye on Arctic Oil” will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from Live Paper Help and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!